Comments for Alternative Energy Mutual Funds

Comment on Insurance Melbourne FL 321-223-9573 Melbourne FL Insurance by 2000ViewsPlease

2000ViewsPlease — Wed, 16 May 2012 14:52:57 +0000

Keep up the amazing work! Thumbs? up!

Comment on Insurance Melbourne FL 321-223-9573 Melbourne FL Insurance by EpicOwnageful

EpicOwnageful — Wed, 16 May 2012 14:12:21 +0000

dislike time?

Comment on Does this scare anyone out there? by scc3175

scc3175 — Sat, 05 May 2012 16:37:34 +0000

I’m glad those illegals are not paying taxes to the criminals in Washington!

Comment on Does this scare anyone out there? by Old School ??MC??™

Old School ??MC??™ — Sat, 05 May 2012 15:56:22 +0000

It doesn’t make sense

Comment on Stocks, Mutual Funds & Retirement Investments : How to Understand the Stock Market Tables & Charts by Ansleydrfg

Ansleydrfg — Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:37:04 +0000

Nice Nice Video. I really loved your video. Youtube can be a great asset for you. If you need any help getting your video exposed, check out this site called tubeviews? [dot net] It has really done wonders for me, I have built 3 Channels up with videos at top in position and this is my forth channel i’m going to working on.

These Services Are Mind Blowing!

Comment on Stocks, Mutual Funds & Retirement Investments : How to Understand the Stock Market Tables & Charts by ChevelleSSLS6

ChevelleSSLS6 — Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:18:25 +0000

Good artwork, even better video! Thanks? for the information.

Comment on Mutual Fund Fees by diodoro73

diodoro73 — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:39:11 +0000

thanks for the info! The added? file brought clarity

Comment on Is $2 million a realistic investment/retirement goal? by ibu guru

ibu guru — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:56:33 +0000

The sooner you start, the better. Rule of 72: divide 72 by your interest rate earned to find out how long it takes your money to double. If you got 10%, it would take 7.2 years to double what you invest. Quadruple in 14.4 years, etc. The power of compounding makes it more important to start early and allow your principal to grow over a longer period.

You’ll probably need more than $ 2 million to retire at age 70. Inflation and taxes eat up your returns. A million is diddly to a retiree today, given the high – and rising – cost of living, outrageous taxes, medical care costs, etc. If they can get 10%, of that $ 100,000/yr, taxes eat more than half. I have friends whose annual property taxes on home are higher than the cost of the house purchased 40 yrs ago. They cannot afford to remain in the home they bought to live out the rest of their lives due to the property taxes. You can reasonably expect the same or worse since the US, 48 of 50 states, counties and cities are all bankrupt and dramatically increasing taxes.

Start with your very first paycheck. You’re gonna need every last cent and then some.

Comment on Hot Hands Mutual Fund Picking Strategy Explained by mark7996

mark7996 — Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:27:24 +0000

do? not take this advice in this economy, this will not work for the next few years….not impressed with the quality of ‘specialists’ on this network.

Comment on Eoin Murray: From CIO Old Mutual Asset Managers ($12bn) to hedge fund founder by OpalesqueTV

OpalesqueTV — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:46:03 +0000

Please go???? to our dedicated site? OpalesqueDotTV?? to?? view? all?? Opalesque?? videos?? with leading hedge fund managers (and investors)??.? You?? can? subscribe to receive free alerts? when we?? publish our? weekly? video?? interview.?

Comment on Eoin Murray: From CIO Old Mutual Asset Managers ($12bn) to hedge fund founder by sicklesickle

sicklesickle — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:35:37 +0000

Thumbs? up.

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by trick29420

trick29420 — Thu, 08 Mar 2012 03:14:15 +0000

@freedomlover4422 That’s the point, China doesn’t force companies to pay for all those bloated expenses, which is? a bigger reason manufacturing moves there than is wage rates.

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by trick29420

trick29420 — Thu, 08 Mar 2012 02:29:22 +0000

@trick29420 If the Gov didn’t make it so expensive, difficult, and dangerous (due to loose liability laws), to do business in the US, then manufacturing would stay here. You don’t? inherently save money by shipping a product tens of thousands of miles around the globe. You do so because of the outrageous financial burdens forced on us by your nanny state, at a cost of ten billion dollars a day.

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by trick29420

trick29420 — Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:37:54 +0000

@freedomlover4422 The Chinese earn more than they would without business. They also live in a fascist (formerly communist) one party system.

NAFTA and GATT are great failures. The financial institutions needed to crash completely, instead of being bailed out over and over again. But what would happen if we introduced huge tariffs or forced companies to hire all US? or union workers with super high salaries and benefits? Products would be too expensive to afford…

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by trick29420

trick29420 — Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:02:11 +0000

@trick29420 Not to mention other countries would? soon fall apart into poverty and millions more would rush to the US trying to immigrate here again diluting the workforce, expanding gov’t handouts and creating more poverty here as well.

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by trick29420

trick29420 — Thu, 08 Mar 2012 00:27:04 +0000

@freedomlover4422 What’s your point? Mexico and China are a whole lot better off working than they used to be. No? What’s your solution? FORCE? That doesn’t work. How will you afford to buy anything when the cost of production skyrockets 200%? Then you’d be bitching about the cost of living. Man made global warming is a? politicians science, more excuses for taxes and control. 40 years ago we were warned of the coming ice age. Now this? The wars for oil are for the petrodollar.

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by trick29420

trick29420 — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 23:59:08 +0000

@freedomlover4422 Really, you think less Mexicans would come here if there were LESS jobs there? I doubt that. China has grown into a world power due to our investment in it and? its labor force. I’m not saying it’s a good thing, just that its truth. If we didn’t send millions of dollars and jobs there, there would be millions more without work, or food.

Climate change is real, but the effects of man are debatable. There are a whole lot more factors than just CO2 in the air.

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by Downfacingdog

Downfacingdog — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:59:31 +0000

Boycott WW III !!! Ron Paul /? Chuck Norris 2012 !!!

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by trick29420

trick29420 — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:04:58 +0000

@freedomlover4422 No. You’re just a waste of time.?

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by MourninGlory

MourninGlory — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:37:47 +0000

@trick29420 The earth goes through hot and cold cycles. In school, I was taught that we are coming out of the ice age.? There’s geological proof that the sea level was higher in the past.

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by trick29420

trick29420 — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:26:14 +0000

@MourninGlory Not to mention the sun’s cycles as well. The sun will reach peak temperature in 2013, at the top of it’s 13 year heating/ cooling cycle. Also, the most abundant ‘greenhouse’ gas is not CO2,? but H2O, water vapor. Regardless, I support all forms of ‘alternate’ energy. Petroleum is no doubt a dead end.

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by MourninGlory

MourninGlory — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:14:40 +0000

@trick29420 I support the research of alternative energy, but I don’t think the government should be involved (Solyndra, Ener1 battery company, and Beacon Power). Since you seem to know so much, do? you know if the sun will absorb the inner planets? I know it won’t happen in my lifetime, but I was wondering if that would also contribute to the earth gradually getting warmer.

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by trick29420

trick29420 — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:48:45 +0000

@MourninGlory I agree. I don’t think the federal government should be subsidizing ANY industry. If they? weren’t already so involved, we would probably already have a viable alternative up and running. If individual states want to make some arrangements fine, but the feds fuck everything up.

As for the sun absorbing inner plants, I’m not really sure. I guess eventually it could happen, but the sun will probably burn out or explode before then.

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by xfactortype1

xfactortype1 — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:03:28 +0000

article on CNBC says the treasury would OK negative yields meaning investors pay a “premium” for us protection. who in their right mind would do that. I’d rather own stock at that? point

Comment on Listener Questions 1/27/12 Preview by Truthpolice9698

Truthpolice9698 — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 19:27:48 +0000

If the unofficial inflation rate is? 8.6% and your bond is 2.6% then you lost 6%. If the official inflation rate is 3.1% and your bond is 2.6% you lost 0.5%. Sooner or later bond holders will realize there is no more demand for US bonds, the current price of the bonds will peak, and then you are looking at a shitty interest rate or a drop in the bond price if you want to sell. When that day comes, and it will come, you will see the professionals leave the market followed by the retail costumers